Geography Qestion. 4/10/2014
Posted by Rod SW WI at 2014-04-10 17:15:54
What state, in the lower 48, has no natural inland lakes?
Response by Robbin at 2014-04-11 07:36:14
Every body of water I know of in Pennsylvania, is behind a dam on a river. So I think PA is a good candidate for this honor.
Response by Carl Byerly at 2014-04-11 07:48:40
West Virginia.
Response by Kirk Ross...Nova Scotia at 2014-04-11 09:38:40
Ohio
Response by Rod SW WI at 2014-04-11 19:52:52
Kirk Ross is correct. Ohio.
Response by Steve at 2014-04-11 22:04:07
Gotta say, false, every state has inland lakes.
Response by Forrest at 2014-04-12 04:41:36
Missouri
Response by Rod SW WI at 2014-04-12 06:07:43
Steve - what state has no NATURAL inland lakes? All my have inpoundments or dams but not natural (they were there when the indians came).
Response by Steve at 2014-04-12 07:27:48
Yes, I understand natural lakes and would have to disagree with Ohio, Lake Erie is a natural lake,(with some real nice fishing) and Ohio would be on its border.
Not trying to be contrary, have a hard time imagining a place with no lakes.
Steve
Response by Leo in N.E. Ohio at 2014-04-12 08:37:36
wild stab at this
West Virginia (SP)
Response by Mike Rock at 2014-04-12 22:17:29
Maryland has no natural lakes.
Ohio has no 'inland' lakes but does indeed border Lake Erie.
Mike
Response by Rod SW WI at 2014-04-13 06:39:25
I will be the first to admit when I am wrong. I am wrong (it happened once before, about 50 years ago) on the lakes. Upon further investigation there are some.
http://www.toledoblade.com/MattMarkey/2012/06/17/Ohio-can-t-deep-6-lakeless-state-label.html Response by Steve at 2014-04-14 11:38:20
Sorry Rod, if you need any practice being wrong, I can give you HER number and you can be wrong by default!
 |
|
PO Box 2067, Cedar Rapids IA 52406-2067
E-Mail:
|
